Home › Forums › Explore Media › Watercolor › Ruined yet again
- This topic has 7 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 4 years, 3 months ago by BeLing.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 9, 2020 at 10:51 am #1322370
Maybe this is too ambitious for me as this is number nine – only one made it to completion.
Once again I messed up his wing. It wasn’t bad until I tried a dry brush of van dyke brown. It didn’t go well, and I tried to dab it out.
Now it looks awful – and no matter what I do from here on in it’ll never have the light delicate look I nearly had. Just mud.
I wouldn’t put it on my wall and that’s my measure of good/bad.
Six hour (this time) down the drain. I’d say it’s an investment in learning except I don’t seem to be learning anything.
August 10, 2020 at 1:03 pm #1322865Actually, I don’t see that it is ruined. It doesn’t look the least bit muddy. A light wash of Van Dyke brown would fit nicely there with not hard edges.
Bonnie Lou Williams
August 10, 2020 at 1:26 pm #1322875Thank you, Bonnie Lou.
I did finish it – I used more of a reddish mixed burnt sienna instead of the van dyke.
Here’s what I recently posted in the “studio”:
This one nearly ended in the stack of seven other unfinished owls. This morning I found the courage and patience to work around my mistakes (to me they were/are glaring). The encouraging comments in “the studio” are always helpful… I get discouraged too easily sitting here by myself.
The end result is acceptable enough to share. As with all my birds, I wanted soft colors and a loose feel. I find that’s hard to do with so many browns…
I mixed some of my own, and used a few from the tube. They are unforgiving and can be stunningly ugly in a heartbeat.
I used the color to a) mask a few errors, b) give it, well, color and interest, and c) by adding a touch of similar colors inside, I tie it all together.
Arches 140 lb paper cut to 8×10. DS and WN tubes.
C&C always appreciated.
Thomas
August 12, 2020 at 6:18 am #1323366It’s been said that, all too often we are our own worst critic. To be honest, I saw nothing wrong with the first image; not even any errors. Unfinished isn’t wrong or bad.
One of the things I love about watercolors is that if a section doesn’t meet expectations or just doesn’t feel right, the pigments can be re-wet and lifted off the paper for a fresh go at it.
Save lives, mask up. ?
August 12, 2020 at 6:31 am #1323371Thank you for the kind words.
I often let perfect become the enemy of good.
Thomas
August 25, 2020 at 2:59 pm #1328358Doesn’t look ruined to me. Looks wonderful!
http://rrafferty.faso.com/
NBAL, CLAG, WAS-H, PSST, Plein Air Austin“Every artist was first an amateur.” Ralph Waldo Emerson
September 1, 2020 at 9:08 pm #1331046Looks that there is nothing wrong with the work, and the painting fits in well.
September 5, 2020 at 12:13 pm #1332583Wow, you have high standards!
That said, I have to say I prefer the version without the background colors. It’s ethereal, thoughtful, beautiful. . . I like the light pencil marks, the open-endedness.
Next one, I hope you consider not “finishing” it.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Register For This Site
A password will be e-mailed to you.
Search