Home › Forums › The Town Center › WC Site Technical Discussions › PROJECT: Product Reviews › FOCUS GROUP: Watercolor PaintsMediumsetc.
- This topic has 37 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 20 years, 11 months ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 3, 2002 at 1:48 am #448121Anonymous
My initial thoughts:
I’ve loaded up a number of watercolor paints/mediums into the product review system. You can check the demo at any time to see what is there, what isn’t, etc.
What we need to do is to continue compiling a solid list of the vendors and their brands If you can find vendor logos/info for vendors that don’t have them yet, product images, product descriptions, etc., post ’em here and I’ll incorporate them into the review system. If you can’t find product images of good quality, product descriptions, etc., or don’t have the time, that’s okay – just post the vendor/brand name here, and I’ll research it.
Also, we need to focus on the rating types for the various Watercolor-related categories. To get us started, feel free to look at the Oil Paints thread for some ideas, as well as the current list of questions for Oil Paints.
NOTE: We will do gouache separately!
The Current List
Here is the current list (which I will try to keep as up-to-date as possible):
-
[*] Color Variety
[*] Consistency/Workability
[*] Container/Tube Quality
[*] Pigment/Color Quality
[*] Value for the MoneyCheers.
ScottSeptember 3, 2002 at 10:25 pm #489615Here’s logo and other info on another fine manufacturer of both watercolors, acrylics and oils: http://www.danielsmith.com/2002/about/about-manufacturing.html
September 4, 2002 at 12:19 pm #489614How about Cheap Joe’s American Journey brand of watercolor? (I’d go grab a copy of the logo etc, but I’m supposed to be working )
Bob
Bob
But me, I just want to live happily ever after, every now and then ...
Jimmy BuffettSeptember 4, 2002 at 2:35 pm #489624Here are a few on-line stores:
Art Xpress: http://www.artxpress.com
Cheap Joes: http://www.cheapjoescatalog.com
The Art Store: http://www.artstore.com (also have brick & mortar stores)
Mister Art: http://www.misterart.com
Hope this helps!
If you don't stand for something, you'll fall for almost anything.
KarenjhSeptember 6, 2002 at 1:15 am #489616http://opusframingandartsupplies.com/
http://www.aswsale.com/arwatpap.html
http://www.artsuppliesdirect.ca/
http://www.waterbasedinks.com/about.html
http://www.artistsclub.com/ac/Lobby.asp
http://www.watercolorpassion.com/link.html
http://www.winsornewton.com/Main/Sitesections/ColorChartsAll/ColourchartsUSA/artistswatercolour.pdfRich Williams A.S.A. I.P.A.P.
Member of Federation of Canadian Artists,
Alberta Society of Artists,
International Plien-Air Painters
http://members.shaw.ca/richwilliamsstudiosWhen we look at a piece of art work it has to form some kind of connection to the viewer. It must evoke a memory or stir the imagination or it will fail to cause the person to return to it and examine it further. By painting some of natures hidden treasures I hope to bring the viewer back to places or times that are stored in their memories.
September 6, 2002 at 1:18 am #489597AnonymousHi there, gang. Thanks for all the links. However, I think we’re pretty set with regard to the initial batch of vendors and products. Subsequent, individual products and vendors, can be suggested through the actual review system itself.
What we need is a very energetic discussion of what rating questions we need to ask reviewers for watercolors, watercolors mediums, etc.
Cheers.
ScottSeptember 6, 2002 at 1:24 am #489617Scott a rating system like a pole of different brands, like WN, Daniel Smith, etc would help.
The same holds true for papers, Arches, Strathmore etc.
Doing a list with area to rate 1-10 would allow each person to rate the different products they have used.Rich
Rich Williams A.S.A. I.P.A.P.
Member of Federation of Canadian Artists,
Alberta Society of Artists,
International Plien-Air Painters
http://members.shaw.ca/richwilliamsstudiosWhen we look at a piece of art work it has to form some kind of connection to the viewer. It must evoke a memory or stir the imagination or it will fail to cause the person to return to it and examine it further. By painting some of natures hidden treasures I hope to bring the viewer back to places or times that are stored in their memories.
September 6, 2002 at 9:34 am #489598AnonymousRich, thanks much for the input. However, it doesn’t really fit in with the model we’re using. Take a look at the initial thread posted here (called Overview: Important Information), as well as the demo, to get a feel for how we’re approaching it.
Almost at 1,000 products now!
September 6, 2002 at 10:17 pm #489618Scott read the overview and now understand where you are going with this. If you need some assistance re the watercolor let me know by PM and indicate what you need.
Rich
Rich Williams A.S.A. I.P.A.P.
Member of Federation of Canadian Artists,
Alberta Society of Artists,
International Plien-Air Painters
http://members.shaw.ca/richwilliamsstudiosWhen we look at a piece of art work it has to form some kind of connection to the viewer. It must evoke a memory or stir the imagination or it will fail to cause the person to return to it and examine it further. By painting some of natures hidden treasures I hope to bring the viewer back to places or times that are stored in their memories.
September 6, 2002 at 10:57 pm #489599AnonymousHi there, Rich, and thanks for the offer.
As you can imagine, I don’t have PMs enabled for my forums account (otherwise, I’d be replying to PMs all day – lol). As I don’t have them enabled, I can’t send them – stupid forum software!
Basically, I’d love your thoughts relative to what we might ask a potential reviewer about things like watercolor paints and mediums. The mediums are a tough lot, because there are different types of products in that category. The paints category will be a little more detailed, I imagine.
I’m not a watercolorist, but imagine questions around the pigment quality, transparency qualities, color selection/variety in the brand, etc. would be a good starting point. The oils thread had some pretty good banter about this – I imagine a lot of it is re-usable.
It is important that we get it right the first time, as once we roll it out with the rating questions in place, we can’t easily go back and add new ones to categories that already have reviews!
Cheers.
ScottSeptember 8, 2002 at 5:30 pm #489600AnonymousI’ve updated the list at the top – thoughts?
September 8, 2002 at 10:18 pm #489619Color comparisons of paints, (By Name), are important as each manufacture has their own particular name for colors. The color hue’s are similar but the names are often different.
Watercolors have different degrees of
: transparency
: staining
: fadingGuaches should also be studied as the are opeak watercolors.
The grade of watercolor paint often indicates the amount of true pigment over fillers used in the manufacture of the paint.
This address’s the workability. With good quality paint you use less to achieve the same reults but with more transparancy and brighter colors.Just some quick thoughts
Rich
Rich Williams A.S.A. I.P.A.P.
Member of Federation of Canadian Artists,
Alberta Society of Artists,
International Plien-Air Painters
http://members.shaw.ca/richwilliamsstudiosWhen we look at a piece of art work it has to form some kind of connection to the viewer. It must evoke a memory or stir the imagination or it will fail to cause the person to return to it and examine it further. By painting some of natures hidden treasures I hope to bring the viewer back to places or times that are stored in their memories.
September 8, 2002 at 10:23 pm #489601Anonymous[em]Originally posted by Rich Williams [/em]
[B]Color comparisons of paints, (By Name), are important as each manufacture has their own particular name for colors. The color hue’s are similar but the names are often different.
[/quote]I agree, but that isn’t really the purpose of the rating system, Rich. Trying to devise a system to compare individual colors between brands and mediums would be an entirely different animal than what we have now.
[quote]
Watercolors have different degrees of
: transparency
: staining
: fading
[/quote]So would you recommend these 3 as individual rating questions? Any chance of cobbling up a quick description for each, in the form of a question, as we would present them to a reviewer? And what the 5 possible answers would be, from worst to best, for each?
[quote]
Guaches should also be studied as the are opeak watercolors.
[/quote]They are in a separate category … we will do those separately from traditional artist’s watercolors.
[quote]
The grade of watercolor paint often indicates the amount of true pigment over fillers used in the manufacture of the paint.
This address’s the workability. With good quality paint you use less to achieve the same reults but with more transparancy and brighter colors.
[/B]So is our “Consistency/Workability” question unnecessary for watercolors? Or is it still something we should ask, as it may vary from one brand to the next?
Cheers.
ScottSeptember 8, 2002 at 10:58 pm #489620Watercolors have different degrees of
: transparency
: staining
: fadingSo would you recommend these 3 as individual rating questions? Any chance of cobbling up a quick description for each, in the form of a question, as we would present them to a reviewer? And what the 5 possible answers would be, from worst to best, for each?
Yes these three questions should be includedTransparency the colors ability to show light from within.
opeak, muddy when mixed with one color,
somewhat transparent, clear when mixed with other colors, clear and bright when glazed overStaining how the color affects the paper and the ability to lift out color after it has been applied.
stains quickly, slight stain, removable with some effort, light stain, no stainFading how the paint will react and will the color fade in time with exposure to bright light.
will fade, mild fading in sunlight, UVL added,
sunlight color fast no fadingquote:
quote
The grade of watercolor paint often indicates the amount of true pigment over fillers used in the manufacture of the paint.
This address’s the work ability. With good quality paint you use less to achieve the same results but with more transparency and brighter colors.So is our “Consistency/Work ability” question unnecessary for watercolors? Or is it still something we should ask, as it may vary from one brand to the next?
I think that the question should still be asked as it goes to the mater of how each person works their paint.I also think that we might need to address some of the mediums used in watercolor
Gum Arabic, ox gall, etc.
Support WetCanvas!: NYOS – Cool WC! gear! – WC! Web Hosting for Artists!
Rich Williams A.S.A. I.P.A.P.
Member of Federation of Canadian Artists,
Alberta Society of Artists,
International Plien-Air Painters
http://members.shaw.ca/richwilliamsstudiosWhen we look at a piece of art work it has to form some kind of connection to the viewer. It must evoke a memory or stir the imagination or it will fail to cause the person to return to it and examine it further. By painting some of natures hidden treasures I hope to bring the viewer back to places or times that are stored in their memories.
September 8, 2002 at 11:17 pm #489602AnonymousThanks for the descriptive info, Rich – I’ll work it in …
[em]Originally posted by Rich Williams [/em]
[B]
I also think that we might need to address some of the mediums used in watercolorGum Arabic, ox gall, etc.
[/B]Those are already in. We have a separate categories for the various types of Mediums.
Cheers.
Scott -
AuthorPosts
- The topic ‘FOCUS GROUP: Watercolor PaintsMediumsetc.’ is closed to new replies.
Register For This Site
A password will be e-mailed to you.
Search