Home › Forums › The Town Center › WC Site Technical Discussions › PROJECT: Product Reviews › FOCUS GROUP: Brushes
- This topic has 34 replies, 17 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 8 months ago by Anonymous.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 3, 2002 at 1:52 am #448122Anonymous
My initial thoughts:
It doesn’t make sense to load up each individual brush out there (we’d be here for 10 years just trying to do that!). Instead, my guess is that it will be easier to load up the “line” or “series” of brushes, by brand, and allow folks to rate those.
Example: Grumbacher Gainsborough Brushes
If a reviewer has something to say about a particular brush in the line being reviewed, they can bring this up in the text of their review.
You can see the initial category breakdown in the demo.
What we need to do is compile a solid list of the vendors, their brands, and which category they best fit into. If you can find vendor logos, product images, product descriptions, etc., post ’em here and I’ll incorporate them into the review system. If you can’t find product images of good quality, product descriptions, etc., or don’t have the time, that’s okay – just post the vendor/brand name here, and I’ll research it.
The Current List
Here is the current list (which I will try to keep as up-to-date as possible):
-
[*] Quality of Construction: poorly made or solid state?
[*] Comfortability? How comfortable are these brushes to use?
[*] Quality of fiber/hair
[*] Value for the MoneyCheers.
ScottSeptember 3, 2002 at 10:36 am #489634Anonymous**NOTE: I will keep this list as update as possible **
Finding information on the various lines of brushes out there is a difficult task. Most of the vendors (as you all know) have horriblly outdated web sites.
Some brands/lines that I know of (please provide corrections/additions!)
Daler-Rowney Robert Simmons Sapphire
Daler-Rowney Robert Simmons Signet
Daler-Rowney Robert Simmons Expression
Daler-Rowney Robert Simmons White Sable
Daler-Rowney Robert Simmons Sienna
Daler-Rowney Robert Simmons Skyscraper (Series 755)Holbein Professional White Brushes
W&N Cirrus
W&N Sceter Gold
W&N Cotman
W&N University
W&N Water Color Brushes
W&N WInton
W&N Artisan
W&N Galeria
Loew Cornell Arttec White
Loew Cornell Arttec Red
Loew Cornell Bristle
Loew Cornell Classic Bristle
Loew Cornell Natural Hair
Loew Cornell Mixtique
Loew Cornell American Painter
Loew Cornell Comfort
Loew Cornell La Corneille TaklonGrumbacher Gainsborough
Grumbacher Golden Edge
Grumbacher Finest Bristle
Grumbacher AcademySilver Brush Limited: Grand Prix
Silver Brush Limited: Silverstone
Silver Brush Limited: Faye
Silver Brush Limited: Le Mans
Silver Brush Limited: Golden Natural
Silver Brush Limited: Ruby Satin
Silver Brush Limited: Renaissance
Silver Brush Limited: Silverwhite
Silver Brush Limited: Wash & Blend
Silver Brush Limited: Mops
Silver Brush Limited: Ultra Mini
Silver Brush Limited: Black Velvet
Silver Brush Limited: 7500
Silver Brush Limited: Premier
Silver Brush Limited: Silver KolinskyABS Brushes: Kolinsky for Watercolour Series
ABS Brushes: Pure Red Sable for Watercolour Series
ABS Brushes: Pure Squirrels
ABS Brushes: Reflex
ABS Brushes: Golden Synthetic Nylon
ABS Brushes: Mongoose for Watercolours/Oils/Acrylics
ABS Brushes: Best Quality Bristle
ABS Brushes: Bristle
ABS Brushes: Bristle Stencil/PowderRoyal & Langnickel: Soft-Grip
Royal & Langnickel: Aqualon
Royal & Langnickel: Sunburst
Royal & Langnickel: Snowhite
Royal & Langnickel: White Taklon
Royal & Langnickel: Golden Taklon
Royal & Langnickel: Royal Knight
Royal & Langnickel: Doll Collection
Royal & Langnickel: Royal Garden
Royal & Langnickel: Nocturna
Royal & Langnickel: Combo
Royal & Langnickel: Pure Red Sable
Royal & Langnickel: Supreme
Royal & Langnickel: RegisOther vendors/brands that I know of, but haven’t broken down into lines/series yet:
Princeton
Dynasty
Nicole
Escoda
Isabey
Dick Blick
Borciani & Bonazzi (Italian brushes)
Carlo Kolloeffel (Italian)Cheers.
ScottSeptember 3, 2002 at 10:38 am #489635AnonymousIdeas for rating questions on brushes:
– Durability: how well does this brush hold up after continued use?
– Construction Quality: how well are they built? Do the bristles fall out? The ferrule break off? etc.
– Quality of fiber: How would you rate the quality of the hair/fiber in this line of brushes?
– Ease in Cleaning: Are they hard to clean?I am far from being a brush expert – these may or may not be useful.
Cheers.
ScottSeptember 6, 2002 at 10:49 am #489636AnonymousMore thoughts. I have brush manufacturers. They seemingly cannot “keep it simple”!
I have yet to find an art supply manufacturer that actually has all of their products on their web site. There are a few that are close. Winsor & Newton has virtually no information on its brushes at all. Same for Daler-Rowney. Go figure.
So many brands, so many series/lines, and some brushes don’t even appear in a series or line. Not sure what the best way to approach this is.
I don’t want to put in every single brush as an individual item.
Also, I’m not sure my categories are accurate. There exists a lot of crossover in those categories. Some brushes are useful for oils and acrylics, for instance.
Thoughts welcome!
Cheers.
ScottSeptember 6, 2002 at 10:53 am #489652How about Dick Blick’s own line of brushes? There seems to be a lot of them, let me see if I can find a list.
I must create a system, or be enslav'd by another man's;
I will not reason and compare; my business is to create.
~ W. Blake
Thirdroar - My Portfolio.September 6, 2002 at 11:15 am #489655I use the Winsor & Newton Cirrus, series 550, long handled, flat brushes almost exclusively in my painting. I have found that they are very durable and comfortable to paint with.
After use, I place the brush in a glass of turpenoid, and continue painting with another brush. When I’m finished painting–or when all my brushes are in the glass–I brush the bristles agains the side of the glass, squeezing the thinned paint out, then dry with a paper towel. After all the brushes are partially cleaned in this way I take them to the sink and use a mild soap such as Nutrogena to finish cleaning them, working the soap into the bristles and squeezing it out under a flow of warm water until the water runs clear.
I have used most of these brushes for two years and they show little wear. Rarely have I had a bristle fall out in a painting.
On a scale of 1 – 10, I’d rate them a 10.
Wes
September 6, 2002 at 11:18 am #489637AnonymousOf course, you’ll have the chance to rate them officially in the new review system when we roll it out.
The question is: do we list the individual series, or the entire line? As some vendors do not seemingly break their brushes down into “lines” or “brands”, this may be tough. This may be very much of a “hybrid” set of categories.
Also, we need input on those review questions, gang. What do we need to ask a reviewer when evaluating/rating a line of brushes?
For a detailed overview of the rating scheme we are using, see the thread entitled “Overview: Important Information”.
Cheers.
ScottSeptember 6, 2002 at 11:20 am #489656OK, that link isn’t working. Try Google: winsor newton cirrus
September 6, 2002 at 11:25 am #489657In Mr. Mom, Michael Keaton drives into the school to drop the kids off in the wrong direction. Everyone tells him, “You’re doing it wrong.”
I’m doing it wrong. LOL
OK, I think it would be difficult to rate an entire line, such as the Cirrus, since there are brushes made for watercolor and others made for oil, in the same line. I would say break it down into series where you can, and leave it in a line category where this would be impractical. Another question you might ask is if the brush is comfortable, which includes thickness and lenth of the handle.
Hope this helps,
Wes
September 6, 2002 at 11:47 am #489653[em]Originally posted by scottb [/em]
[B]Ideas for rating questions on brushes:– Durability: how well does this brush hold up after continued use?
– Construction Quality: how well are they built? Do the bristles fall out? The ferrule break off? etc.
– Quality of fiber: How would you rate the quality of the hair/fiber in this line of brushes?
– Ease in Cleaning: Are they hard to clean?
[/B]Well, how detailed do you want to get?
Ferrules: Seamed or seamless? Aluminum, tin, or brass/copper? Is the crimping functional, or is it just decorative, with the ferrule only glued on?
Construction – machine made or hand made? Are the hairs cut at the tips to even the brush up?
Hairs and bristles – are they natural or synthetic? Are they what they claim to be, or are they a mix? Some sables, for example, are actually a mix of sable and dyed ox hair, or even dyed synthetics. And badger brushes aren’t always made with badger hair anymore, so what might be called a ‘badger brush’ may not actually have any badger hair in it at all. For bristle brushes, do the bristles contain a lot of flags?
As for ease in cleaning, well I think that has more to do with your cleaning methods and materials than the brush itself.
Just thoughts off the top of my head.
Amy
I must create a system, or be enslav'd by another man's;
I will not reason and compare; my business is to create.
~ W. Blake
Thirdroar - My Portfolio.September 6, 2002 at 1:26 pm #489651DraigAtharmakes good points. I’m wondering if you need one review page for wc brushes and another for oils??? (Yeah. Leave it to me to complicate things.) I look for different handling qualities in the two. For instance, with a bristle brush for oils – how much scrubbing can it stand? With a sable for watercolors – does it carry a heavy load well and keep a fine point?
My favorite wc brush ever: http://www.cheapjoescatalog.com/catalog/products.asp?id=107&pid=17&ppid=2
Good luck Scott. Thanks for keeping us involved.
Painting keeps me sane when it isn't making me crazy.
September 6, 2002 at 2:33 pm #489638AnonymousGood thoughts, Draig!
[em]Originally posted by DraigAthar [/em]
Well, how detailed do you want to get?
[/quote]I want to get as detailed as possible, without getting scientifically “ridiculous” in the process.
Seriously, though, basically, I just want us all to throw out ideas, come up with an initial “list” of rating questions, and continue to refine our list until we feel that it is adequate. I don’t want rating questions so complex that only 3 people in the world are actually qualified to fill out a review, but I don’t want it to be so simple as to invite masses of unqualified people to review an item either.
Hope that makes sense – lol.
Keep those ideas coming!
Cheers.
ScottSeptember 6, 2002 at 2:35 pm #489639Anonymous[em]Originally posted by ellenf [/em]
[B]DraigAtharmakes good points. I’m wondering if you need one review page for wc brushes and another for oils??? (Yeah. Leave it to me to complicate things.)
[/quote]Actually, we have them split apart currently for the reasons that you pointed out. The issue will be the so-called “multi-medium” brushes.
[quote]
Good luck Scott. Thanks for keeping us involved. [/B]Hey, I couldn’t possibly do this by myself. There is too much knowledge out there in WC-land – we need to leverage our collective wisdom and do this thing right the first time!
Cheers.
ScottSeptember 8, 2002 at 5:44 pm #489640AnonymousI’ve updated the list at the top – thoughts?
September 13, 2002 at 10:27 am #489641AnonymousStill looking for some more thoughts on how to best approach the reviewing of brushes.
I am examining the effort needed to break the brushes down into “series”, rather than “line/brand”. There are some pros to this:
-
[*] It is easy then to put the brushes into the appropriate category, even within the same line. For example, W&N Cirrus brushes are available in several series for watercolors, and several for oil/acrylic.
[*] This facilitates better reviews – as the reviews will be more focusedThen, there is the big downside:
-
[*] There will be a LOT more product entries to wade through. One brand/line may contain 10 or more series of brushes. So instead of one item entry for “W&N Cirrus”, there will be a dozen, each with their own reviews.
I am wondering if it wouldn’t be better to group the series together as a single item. Example:
W&N Cirrus (Watercolor Series)
W&N Cirrus (Oil/Acrylic Series)Then, basically, in the item description, we can list the individual series, and what they are. This keeps the item count down to something manageable, and still allows for separation where appropriate.
This way, when people rate the brushes, they can rate all of the series that are applicable for that medium (i.e. rating all of the Cirrus brushes designed for watercolors). I don’t think that the differences between the series (in the same medium) are worth reviewing separately. Thoughts?
Cheers.
Scott -
AuthorPosts
- The topic ‘FOCUS GROUP: Brushes’ is closed to new replies.
Register For This Site
A password will be e-mailed to you.
Search