WetCanvas
Home Member Services Content Areas Tools Info Center WC Partners Shop Help
Channels:
Search for:
in:

Welcome to the WetCanvas forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit our help center.

Go Back   WetCanvas > Explore Media > Oil Painting
User Name
Password
Register Mark Forums Read

Salute to our Partners
WC! Sponsors

Our Sponsors
Reply  
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Report Bad Post  
Old 12-04-2010, 03:47 PM
Eric77 Eric77 is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 5
 
Question Gamblin Gamvar VS. Old Holland Picture Varnish

Requesting anybody`s advice on which varnish to use (or should I say try). I currently paint with Old Holland paints and to me it would make the most sense to varnish with the same company`s product BUT I have read some amazing things about Gamvar and if you read Gamblin`s site, it`s very convincing. Any thoughts would be appreciated.

Eric

PS....I`m looking for high quality stuff that will last, any suggestions outside of the above mentioned products is welcome as well.
Reply With Quote
  #2   Report Bad Post  
Old 12-04-2010, 04:08 PM
donn_granros's Avatar
donn_granros donn_granros is offline
A WetCanvas! Patron Saint
Elk River, Mn
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,063
 
Hails from United States
Re: Gamblin Gamvar VS. Old Holland Picture Varnish

I've been using Soluvar Varnish with good results.

http://www.dickblick.com/products/li...luvar-varnish/

As to whether it is a better product than others is pretty tough to say in my view. I have no doubt that Gamvar is also a good product but non yellowing etc is a feature of both so I suspect only time will tell ultimately which is best. (likely applies to any decent manufacturers product)
__________________
Donn Granros

"If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went." --Will Rogers
Reply With Quote
  #3   Report Bad Post  
Old 12-05-2010, 10:55 AM
Dana Design's Avatar
Dana Design Dana Design is offline
Moderator
In My Art
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 13,941
 
Re: Gamblin Gamvar VS. Old Holland Picture Varnish

I use GamVar exclusively and have never had a problem with it.
__________________
When life hands you lemons, ask for tequila and salt and call me!
Custom Portraiture
Dana D Website
Artists Copyright Info
Reply With Quote
  #4   Report Bad Post  
Old 12-06-2010, 01:16 AM
skopas's Avatar
skopas skopas is offline
Member
san diego
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 59
 
Hails from United States
Re: Gamblin Gamvar VS. Old Holland Picture Varnish

I've only used Gamvar so far, and it's been great. It could be possibly one of the best varnishes around. It's real thin, doesn't yellow with time, dries rather quickly and adds a luminous quality to your painting. Oh, forgot to mention and the smell is hardly noticeable, but still keep a window or two open.
Reply With Quote
  #5   Report Bad Post  
Old 12-06-2010, 01:33 PM
WFMartin's Avatar
WFMartin WFMartin is offline
A Local Legend
Glendale, Arizona
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 6,940
 
Hails from United States
Re: Gamblin Gamvar VS. Old Holland Picture Varnish

Three attributes of a good, final varnish:

It protects the surface.

It evens out the high and low (gloss/dull) areas.

It is removable.

Most varnishes protect the surface, and enhance the appearance, but the last one is often ignored. It must be removable, and with the weakest of all solvents.

GamVar does all these things. It removes easiy with Gamsol (its own solvent), and without dissolving the painted surface beneath it. I've had occasion to actually remove it from two paintings, and it came off clean, and without damaging the painting. It is a synthetic resin, which is quite useful when one uses natural resins in their oil paint. The synthetic resin is just a bit IN-compatible with the surface of the painting, and that is good, because it doesn't tend to cross-link, and bond with the surface of the painting, as a natural resin varnish could do.

I would recommend that the dilution for a "retouch varnish" is much better using 1 part Varnish to 3 parts Gamsol, rather than the 1 to 5 ratio that is recommended in the directions.

I've used GamVar for several years, now, and I actually won a top award with a painting that had GamVar applied to it, and it was the appearance of the finish of the painting that swung the vote between my painting, and the runner up, according to the person who accompanied the judge. I figure that's about all the validity that is required to be able to recommend it.

It does tend to bead up, when applied to a hard, dry surface. But, that can be eliminated by continued brushing across the area. I usually apply up to 3 coats of the retouch varnish in order to achieve a nice, even finish, but that is easy to do. It is much slower drying than such natural resin varnishes as Damar, and for me that is an advantage. It gives me more brushing and leveling time.

I apply a retouch varnish after the painting has dried about 2 weeks after becoming touch-dry. I then frame it, and show, or sell it. After 6 months or more, I apply a final version right over it.
__________________
wfmartin. My Blog "Creative Realism"...www.williamfmartin.blogspot.com
Reply With Quote
  #6   Report Bad Post  
Old 12-06-2010, 04:46 PM
Einion's Avatar
Einion Einion is offline
A WC! Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 10,623
 
Hails from Hong Kong
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric77
I currently paint with Old Holland paints and to me it would make the most sense to varnish with the same company`s product...
When it comes to dissimilar products like this (made from completely different ingredients) that may not be at all necessary.

If the OH varnish you're looking at is the one made from a ketone resin it's likely to be similar to or even the same as various competing products from other makers. If it's either the dammar or mastic varnish then the competing products based on synthetic resins are better in a number of respects, principally in how well they age.

Einion
__________________
Do you know if your colour is off in hue, value, chroma... or all three?


Colour Theory & Mixing forum WetCanvas Glossary Search Tips Advanced Search Acrylics forum Acrylics - Information Kiosk
Reply With Quote
  #7   Report Bad Post  
Old 12-07-2010, 01:09 PM
gunzorro's Avatar
gunzorro gunzorro is offline
A WetCanvas! Patron Saint
Simi Valley, California
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,316
 
Hails from United States
Re: Gamblin Gamvar VS. Old Holland Picture Varnish

Like Donn, I prefer the Soluvar varnishes (comes in gloss and matte, and can be mixed to desired finish). Second, I like the Old Holland gloss picture varnish (it is synthetic). After those two, I'd consider the Gamvar.

The things I don't care for with Gamvar are 1) beading, 2) some sunken areas remain, 3) plastic feeling gloss finish.

Soluvar seems to have the best UV resistance in my testing, and OH had the best surface gloss/finish for me (also applied easily, like water).

But any of those three are good quality picture varnishes.
Reply With Quote
  #8   Report Bad Post  
Old 12-08-2010, 11:54 AM
Eric77 Eric77 is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 5
 
Re: Gamblin Gamvar VS. Old Holland Picture Varnish

@ gunzorro: So to apply the OH Varnish, any tips?
Reply With Quote

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:19 PM.


Copyright 1998-2013, F+W Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.