WetCanvas
Home Member Services Content Areas Tools Info Center WC Partners Shop Help
Channels:
Search for:
in:

Welcome to the WetCanvas forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit our help center.

Go Back   WetCanvas > Explore Media > Photography > The Shutterbug Pub
User Name
Password
Register Mark Forums Read

Salute to our Partners
WC! Sponsors

Our Sponsors
Reply  
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Report Bad Post  
Old 02-14-2010, 12:24 PM
cambanet cambanet is offline
New Member
New York
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 48
 
Photographic Composition by Alexander Lapin

Studying of photography usually starts with learning technical site of it - camera, Photoshop, color management, printing. And then we proceed to shot masterpieces. This process leaves a glaring gap in development called 'COMPOSITION'.
Arguably the best teacher of composition is completely unknown in US Russian photographer and writer Alexander Lapin whose book on composition "Photography as..." is bestseller in Russia but was never translated in English which I consider a big loss to American public.
I'm fine art photographer and I'm Russian and English speaker. With permission of Mr. Lapin I've translated bits and pieces from his book, mainly his reviews of photographs where he expresses his views on composition. I have his permission to publish them on the Internet and Mr. Lapin promised to take part in discussion and answer questions.
Mr. Lapin was one of the Soviet underground photographers, one of those who being highly educated used to do manual labor for living and in free time take pictures that showed the real life as it was at the time. After the crash of the Soviet Union he became educator, teaches photography in Moscow University, published bestselling book that was never translated in English.

Review of "The walk to paradise garden" by Eugene Smith



Reader: I know well this photograph, many times saw it in the books. Doesn't it seem to you that it is very simplistic? Eugene Smith has much more interesting works. The photograph with the children - this is rather a poster, which is completely single-minded.
Author: For a long time I thought so too. But at the same time I could never let go this photograph, I felt in it some mystery, hidden meaning. And it was very recently that I had resolved it's mystery.
R.: So tell me what is the secret here.
A.: Not so fast, it took me almost 40 years to find solution. So be patient. For the first time I saw this photograph on the exhibition “Humankind” by Edward Steichen whom the Americans brought into Moscow in the 60's. Later I was introduced to other works of Eugene Smith and it is 20 years now that to a question “who your favorite photographer?” I always answer: “Eugene Smith, unusual person and terrific photographer”.
“The walk to Paradise Garden” - one of the most surprising photographs I know. With all its seeming simplicity it has extraordinarily deep content. In any case, this is not a simple photograph of the children walking in the forest, but parable about the fate of humanity, such depth opens in this at first glance simple photograph. By metaphoric nature and force of philosophical generalization it is comparable perhaps with paintings by Pieter Bruegel .
It is necessary very carefully examine this magic photograph and to perceive composition as it is. Cut out by black leaves of foreground white negative space comes out forward and becomes a figure. This is helped by the fact that black leaves (also as spots on the ground) practically do not have texture. Furthermore, the white form outlines resemble the tree bent by wind.
And here happens the most surprising: black masses step back and become background.
R.: Even so, what does it change? Children walk along the path, they left the shadow for the lighted area.
A.: If we perceive the image only logically really nothing has changed, information on the surface is still the same. Children go from black into the lighted area (from the Darkness to the Light). However if we trust our purely visual, subconscious perception then we will get the following picture: children really go to the illuminated trees far away, black masses from above and from below create foreground. But simultaneously white negative space becomes foreground and black masses again become the Darkness which awaits poor children. Moreover the very black figures of children are perceived in front of the white negative form and at the same time behind it. They are the parts of the black area. They came to the lawn but simultaneously already they passed “through” the white and again they proved to be in the black Darkness.
This photograph is made in 1946, the war has ended, people were tired from it and came to believe that this will never happen again. The people dreamed about bright future for their children, hence the poster like enthusiasm of photograph. But the content of it is considerably deeper.
Being in Hell we dream about Paradise, but after getting there we again move into the darkness of Hell. And so endlessly. This is quintessence of human history.
R.: After your explanations I actually perceive something like this. But why it took you 40 years to understand how photograph works?
A.: To perceive photograph adequately, not as window into three-dimensional reality, but as flat image with its special features of the sensory perception of space, become aware of subconscious sensations is extraordinarily difficult. At fault is the head which always selects the simplest version corresponding to the ordinary logic of the three-dimensional space of our existence and does not allow other interpretations.
What is more objective, the usual perception of this photograph or my version? Visual perception is always objective, even if its language is not words but images or sensations which are based on the objective laws of psychology of the perception of space in the flat image.
There is the simpler explanation - look carefully at upper half of photograph “Walk to Paradise Garden”, there are no doubts - black leaves on top are perceived further than white “tree”, they are no longer leaves even, but black sky afar. This is the manifestation of the heterogeneity of depictive plane, its top and bottom.
Reply With Quote
  #2   Report Bad Post  
Old 02-14-2010, 12:49 PM
cambanet cambanet is offline
New Member
New York
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 48
 
Review of 'Budapest" by Lee Miller

Budapest, 1946. The photographer Lee Miller takes picture of the execution of a man who, in all likelihood, collaborated with the Germans in WWII. She does it, as we can guess, from the window on the second or third floor of apartment building or hotel.
By sheer luck the vantage point proved to be the most accurate. First, due to the photographing from above the line of shooters got lowered, and man whom they shoot rose above them. And amazingly he falls accurately into the opening between two people in the black (also his figure repeats the negative space between two soldiers).
This significant coincidence tells a lot. Criminal and executors with guns are equally black, they are similar in color and size. He could've shot with them together at another criminal.
And this association has completely rational reason. Unity, based on the connection of the similarity of color or tone is a strong one. We identify to some degree two similar figures or details (if the degree of similarity is sufficient enough). As if they are made of one substance or they are of one nature, we search (and we find!) in their similarity deeper semantic connections.
What can be common between the priest in the white robe and the white bags behind the back of the prisoner? (There are no other similar white figures or details in the image). Here we begin to compare and to join these two white shapes. And again we search for the associative connection between them. It looks like this priest stands behind the back of the man at whom they shoot, this is the priest who will be shot. Indeed it is his work and his true destination.
Reply With Quote
  #3   Report Bad Post  
Old 02-14-2010, 01:20 PM
cambanet cambanet is offline
New Member
New York
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 48
 
Review of "Christian in Dagone" by Abbas


This is photograph by Abbas titled “Christian in Dagone”. Photograph is composed around one unique component - cross that is placed in the center of the image. It looks as if the head and the face of the man are not needed in the picture, they only distract viewer attention.
The photograph strikes not only by showing the situation depicted and its symbolic meaning, not only by the fact that the texture of the wall is somewhat similar to the skin of the black character, all of this is of course important and it is consciously evaluated.
Something else is important in this photograph - sharpness, strangeness of composition. It looks as if photographer did not consider the figure of the man depicted in the image and particularly his face, as if he did not see them. Intentionally or not the author arranged the image in such way as if there is only white cross with a hand on it.
But this is not right! In any photographic school student would get low mark for such work. But what is not permitted to student is allowed to the master.
The unusual original composition causes strong tension which is simply shocking for inquisitive eye. It is even possible to indicate the place where this tension appears. There is strong pressure from the picture frame to the face (or from the face to the picture frame). The same pressure is experienced by the picture frame in the upper part because of the division by the horizontal of the cross which is very far from golden means proportions. Also we can see suffering in the face and it corresponds to that dramatic sensation which appears because of this tension!
The most interesting is following - if the photograph by Abbas was composed accordingly to the rules it would lose large part of its attractiveness. And this is easy to see by expanding the image to the right or to the right and upward.
Let us emphasize that this effect appears as a result of specific arrangement of geometric figures and it is not connected directly with information who is this person and what he does. It means that sensation this is caused by the composition of photograph and only then “it is added” in our consciousness to the sense of proceeding.
This method - deliberate isolation by the frame of one component and ignoring the others - sometimes works, but it's not worth to copy it, it works only in exceptional cases. Usually this method gets low mark for sloppy composition.
Reply With Quote
  #4   Report Bad Post  
Old 02-17-2010, 07:22 AM
cambanet cambanet is offline
New Member
New York
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 48
 
Developing visual sensitivity

Quoting a Russian newspaper: "Mr. Lapin alone replaced all schools of thinking in Russian photography that never existed". In this post I’ll try to retell a few pages of his book. All quoted text is direct translation from Mr. Lapin’s book.

Here is the gist of Mr. Lapin's ideas on developing visual sensitivity.

Certainly ability to see and feel composition (as an ear for music) is allotted to few people from birth, but to develop sense of composition to some degree, to learn compositional vision is possible. For studying the language of composition three ways can be proposed.

The first way - comparison.

Put 2 pictures on the wall and compare them. Some people will learn to see the difference fast, others will need to look at thousands of pictures and hopefully they will learn to see it too.

For this purpose 2 versions of the same picture can be used where one detail is removed in Photoshop or masked with paper. Also different versions of cropping can be used.

Mr. Lapin*stresses that only similar looking versions of the same picture should be used for comparison.

The process of learning by comparison should take long time - not one day.

It’s also important how to look; usually we pay too much attention to the plot, to the information on the surface. We need to learn to see the forms and figures depicted on the paper and their combination.

For this purpose the image can be viewed upside down. Very helpful to view it under a different light, for example - moonlight. It helps to look at the image through the mirror. Also we can try to look at image from greater distance or without glasses or having strongly squinted. The less we see the better we perceive.

Mr. Lapin also suggested following exercise:

Place an image in front of you without looking at it, close your eyes, then open for the shortest time possible and close again. Impression of the image will stay in your eyes as main shapes, no details. This may help to see shapes.

As the second way Mr. Lapin suggests to work with geometrical figures. Cut them out from the black paper and move them in the frame made of white paper. You can start with 2 figures, then 3 and more. This exercise allows perceiving compositional interactions in their pure form.

The figures should be glued to the white paper non-permanently to allow moving them when you decide to improve the composition. Also helps to make similar compositions for comparison before selecting the best one.

Examples.



In the picture on the left the black circle in the left top corner is too big, doesn’t match other circles

Picture on the right - correct version.



Here in the left picture the rectangular it too big, the circle is too small. On the right picture you see the fixed version.

The third way is analysis. Mr. Lapin also refers to “the third way” as “the third stage” meaning that these tree ways are sequential stages.

So the following stage of studying composition - study of famous paintings and photographs. The work of art should be analyzed in order to understand it.

The idea is that a great piece of art has perfect composition which can’t be changed.

Mr. Lapin suggests removing elements masking them with tape. Tape’s tone should match the tone of the masked element.

There are a lot of details in every composition, some of them are more important then the others. The goal it to find the most important detail that unites whole composition. Mr. Lapin suggests making 2 copies of the studied piece of art and then mask details on one copy and compare it to the unaltered copy. If you get feeling that the composition became much worse – you found it. This way we can understand how the composition was built.

Another exercise is to take a picture with failed composition but not hopeless. In this case we look for detail(s) that ruin the composition. This can be done easily in Photoshop where we can remove any detail.
Reply With Quote
  #5   Report Bad Post  
Old 02-17-2010, 08:27 AM
shadwell's Avatar
shadwell shadwell is online now
Enthusiast
north west uk
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,854
 
Hails from Scotland
Re: Photographic Composition by Alexander Lapin

to me there is only one rule in photography composition
( " rules are there to be broken !! )

you are correct in the technical aspect but not everything is technical and just works

as any art photography is subjective you can have everything technicaly right but no one likes the shot

but on the other hand you can have everything wrong and people can't get enough !!


by blindly following rules we merely produce what others have done before !!
__________________
if at first you don't succede !!!!
give skydiving a miss !!

Reply With Quote

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:32 PM.


Copyright 1998-2013, F+W Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.