WetCanvas
Home Member Services Content Areas Tools Info Center WC Partners Shop Help
Channels:
Search for:
in:

Welcome to the WetCanvas forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit our help center.

Go Back   WetCanvas > The Learning Center > Composition and Design
User Name
Password
Register Mark Forums Read

Salute to our Partners
WC! Sponsors

Our Sponsors
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #46   Report Bad Post  
Old 12-07-2004, 06:56 PM
henrik henrik is offline
Immortalized
Stockholm, Sweden
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 4,015
 
Hails from Sweden
Re: Landscape Composition Rules

henrik as moderator: I am not going to allow this debate to continue in this thread - the two sides had one round each. If you like to continue the general debate on the validity of having any "rules" this it is fine, but not in this thread about Johannes landscape composition article.

Last edited by henrik : 12-07-2004 at 06:58 PM.
  #47   Report Bad Post  
Old 12-08-2004, 04:27 AM
King Rundzap's Avatar
King Rundzap King Rundzap is offline
Enthusiast
New York City
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,137
 
Re: Landscape Composition Rules

Quote:
Originally Posted by henrik
Although I don't think this is the right place to have a debate about composition (love to continue this elsewhere) -

I agree, and that wasn't the point. The point is to comment on the article in question, in the context of all of the praise it is receiving in the thread. It's just another critique in the thread, albeit not as positive a critique.

Quote:
I think what we are trying to preach in this forum is that the so called "rules" are not absolutes and does not tell you right from wrong -

Although the article constantly says "correct", "incorrect", etc. next to images. So it's a bit of a double message, isn't it? I think that not only are they not absolutes, but the suggestions presented in the article, appear to me to be completely arbitrary. That was the main point of my post.

Quote:
they do however point out consequences of certain design decisions and what you may want to do if you do not like the effect.

Consequences for whom though? Not for my interpretation as a viewer. And not for anyone else that I know personally. The second point in my post above is that maybe the arbitrary suggestions have to be learned--they're perhaps not "natural reactions", and as such, should we really be praising them so vehemently?

Quote:
For instance; say that you have a dualism in your design where both shapes have equal visual weight. This typically leads to a ping-pong effect.
Do you want the effect - keep it - else don't.

For me, it doesn't lead to any "ping pong effect", and I'm skeptical it does for anyone else, either, unless they've been "socialized into the cult", so to speak. It's not a debate about composition in general, but a critique about this particular article, in a thread that is primarily (positive) critiques of the article.
  #48   Report Bad Post  
Old 12-08-2004, 04:38 AM
King Rundzap's Avatar
King Rundzap King Rundzap is offline
Enthusiast
New York City
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,137
 
Re: Landscape Composition Rules

Quote:
Originally Posted by henrik
henrik as moderator: I am not going to allow this debate to continue in this thread - the two sides had one round each. If you like to continue the general debate on the validity of having any "rules" this it is fine, but not in this thread about Johannes landscape composition article.


I couldn't agree more. We should stick to comments about this article in this thread, whether they be positive or negative towards the article.

I'll answer dudleyd's comments about other topics in another thread.
  #49   Report Bad Post  
Old 12-11-2004, 01:17 PM
bigflea bigflea is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 971
 
Hails from United States
Re: Landscape Composition Rules

Too much emphasis on picture making rules, and not enough on principles underlying composition. I am sure some of these are helpful as tips and guidelines for making pictures "better", however there are also many erroneous and contradictory ideas especially in regard to the use of color and value. Sound composition comes from an understanding of the relationship of the abstract elements of design and how they interact within the pictorial format, and from the painter's ability to see or perceive hue relationships that are not visually obvious to the non painter. The author dismisses the possibility that increased perception of color distinctions changes the way composition is approached and solved.
k
  #50   Report Bad Post  
Old 01-09-2005, 11:32 AM
JKM's Avatar
JKM JKM is offline
Senior Member
Tasmania, Australia.
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 464
 
Hails from Australia
Re: Landscape Composition Rules

Thanks - Theres some really great pointers for beginners like myself here.
I have found this really useful for my latest painting and I am sure I will use it in the future.


James
  #51   Report Bad Post  
Old 04-03-2005, 01:17 AM
geossl geossl is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 10
 
Re: Landscape Composition Rules

A very good article on composition.
  #52   Report Bad Post  
Old 05-22-2005, 10:34 AM
zeldapelda zeldapelda is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 103
 
Hails from United States
Re: Landscape Composition Rules

Just finished reading your article.
Had to sit down and write to thank you taking the time and putting in the effort to post this excellent article.

It is just wonder and inspiring cant wait to start a landscape.
  #53   Report Bad Post  
Old 07-20-2005, 07:52 AM
geossl geossl is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 10
 
Re: Landscape Composition Rules

Very good and in depth article
  #54   Report Bad Post  
Old 07-25-2005, 12:24 AM
Joe Cartwright Joe Cartwright is offline
Senior Member
Sydney, Australia
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 378
 
Hails from Australia
Re: Landscape Composition Rules

Thank you very much Johannes, your article makes a very useful checklist on composition. I enjoyed it very much.
Joe
  #55   Report Bad Post  
Old 07-30-2005, 08:35 PM
Miss J's Avatar
Miss J Miss J is offline
Senior Member
Central Texas
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 182
 
Hails from United States
Re: Landscape Composition Rules

How I enjoyed it...you will never know how this has helped me - Thank you Johannes.
__________________
Jane Ann
  #56   Report Bad Post  
Old 03-14-2006, 03:29 PM
nana b's Avatar
nana b nana b is offline
Enthusiast
Oklahoma
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,843
 
Hails from United States
Re: Landscape Composition Rules

This is only my 2nd day here and I am really excited about Landscape Compsition Rules! I need to be doing many other things like cooking dinner but I can't pull myself away from the site! All of this is going to help me a lot. I'm looking over my shoulder thinking I could apply some of it to the still life I'm working on now. I wish I could print it off for future use .

Having said that I'm going back to finish reading and studying the rest of it!

Nana B
  #57   Report Bad Post  
Old 03-19-2006, 05:06 AM
TFB's Avatar
TFB TFB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 383
 
Hails from Australia
Re: Landscape Composition Rules

Yes, I too really enjoyed this. Some of the rules I think I do instinctively and it is good to have them confirmed. Being on dial up it has taken me all evening to read, but well worth it!

Thanks Johannes for such an informative article.

T
  #58   Report Bad Post  
Old 04-30-2006, 04:55 PM
acrylicslatehead's Avatar
acrylicslatehead acrylicslatehead is offline
Senior Member
Kent England
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 196
 
Hails from England
Re: Landscape Composition Rules

Very interesting and informative. Having only started to paint approx 7 weeks ago, this is a great help to me.
Thank you
__________________
As always many thanks, all your help is greatly appreciated
John
( acrylicslatehead)
  #59   Report Bad Post  
Old 05-06-2006, 04:32 PM
amurphy amurphy is offline
Veteran Member
Prince Edward Island
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 821
 
Hails from Canada
Re: Landscape Composition Rules

As an absolute beginner, I really found this Rule Book very, very helpful. Sometimes the "artistic licence" that we are allowed will only carry me so far. But now I understand the "suff" in my paintings that is not working, and that is usually the reason, people do not feel the same way about my paintings that I do. These rules that I am unknowingly breaking are the reason why the painting does not work for others. While I am still in awe of the process, {that fact I can actually paint a tree or whatever} but I am not relating it to the rest of the composition. The tree, house, dog, cloud.... While may be well done as a stand alone, can now work better, together, now that I have "the rules"
Thank you very much, Johannes
Audrey
  #60   Report Bad Post  
Old 05-08-2006, 11:08 AM
LarrySeiler's Avatar
LarrySeiler LarrySeiler is offline
A WC! Legend
NE Wisconsin Nicolet National Forest
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 36,431
 
Hails from United States
Re: Landscape Composition Rules

It has been said, debated often that rules are made to be broken...however, good work to hold its water with issues pertaining to design and composition yet would mandate that one knows what rules are broken and for what intended purpose.

to approach painting haphazardly with the "anything goes..." anthem, and then tout one's right to break rules as though the work should then earn reconsideration of worthiness is not really thinking thru the "rules are made to be broken" comment rationally.

Yes...rules can be broken...but it should be done intentionally, knowledgably with artistic license; a license that will unquestionably validate its holder simply by looking at the finished work.

I created rules years ago for drawing the face. It was based upon readings I did of DaVinci's cadavier studies. The rules said things like, "the length of the eye equals the distance between the eyes, equals the width of the nostrils. The distance from pupil to pupil equals the length of the ear, the length of the relaxed closed mouth, the length of the nose and the distance from the mid mouth to bottom of chin"...and so forth. There were more rules.

My son is a well known internationally recognized caricature artist, doing work for Time magazine, Wall Street, being looked at by Mad comics, and many various enterprizes. Years ago I gave those rules to him...and they became a foundation for him to see where and what the unique features were to each individual. Knowing those rules intimately made the unique features of the person to be drawn instantly known, and gave him a strategy for what he would exaggerate and play with.

The rules led to his knowingly and intentionally stretching or breaking of them.

There are many rules and many approaches to landscape painting and I see many new painters here by their own admission "new" or a beginner.

The growth is ever ongoing...and after 30 years of painting nature and landscapes I yet push myself.

This past weekend I took the advice of Emille Gruppe to use red undertones to build up an underpainting prior to painting the greens of nature, and my son Jason and I went plein air painting.

We were discussing on route to our destination how subtle all the greens of nature are, most showing a hint of red or orange which somewhat neutralizes and controls the green, and how Gruppe was smart with his advice to his students.

For many years I've painted on the fly, weaving the hints of color I saw, bringing color under control with complements and so forth...but for fun I painted the following image using Gruppe's suggestion. Even so...I chose to augment his rule. I broke the reds down into three groupings of dark (using a bit of viridian to deepen the red without changing it), a mid red value, and then a light red (using Naples Yellow and white to avoid a pink).

I underpainted with turps the values of the tree masses in foreground and background using these various reds...and did so taking Gruppe's rule to heart and YET augmenting his rule to use for the benefit I decided would work best for myself.

Here is that painting...an 8"x 8" oil....done in about 1-1/2 hours...



Note the red coming thru in transparent passages and where I let it come thru in full. Note the harmony and warmth it gives naturally to the work.

I really enjoyed this...and understanding rules helps certainly. Breaking the rules helps even more when you come to understand your OWN WAY of working, and why your instincts lead you to adjust the rules for the sake of convenience.
__________________
Larry Seiler- Signature Member IPAP
"My Painting From Life" blog
Main website!

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:26 PM.


© 2014 F+W All rights reserved.