Thanks for all the answers so far folks, I think we've covered all the usual areas when the subject of hues come up - including one of the ones that's often overlooked, that hues aren't necessarily inferior to the original paint they substitute for. They can sometimes be better in certain ways, occasionally in all ways.
Carolyn, to add some things on a couple of your specific points:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AbstractArt99
If so, are student grade paint "hues" and convenience mixes actually a hindrance? Should I be buying paints that only contain one pigment and learning to mix from those?
|
I think it's good general policy to actively seek out single-pigment paints and to prefer those in place of mixtures.
You don't have to take this to extremes and refuse to buy any mixtures just on principle, some mixtures could be worthwhile conveniences and useful
to you. But it is worth bearing in mind that if a convenience colour is made from pigments that are available as single-pigment paints they are much more versatile than the mix.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AbstractArt99
I guess my main concern is if I spend a lot of time learning to mix with student substitute hues, then when I move onto using artist grade paints I'm going to have a lot of relearning to do.
|
There is some inevitability of this I'm afraid. This is inherent to painting more broadly than just with hues versus the genuine article. Different versions of 'the same' colour can be quite different in some cases, as mentioned in a couple of ways above. I can remember vividly the problem I had dealing with a version of Raw Umber in a new brand because it was almost completely unalike the one I had previously been used to; it wasn't just that they were very different in colour, they had very different consistencies and opacities too.
Einion