WetCanvas
Home Member Services Content Areas Tools Info Center WC Partners Shop Help
Channels:
Search for:
in:

Welcome to the WetCanvas forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit our help center.

Go Back   WetCanvas > The WetCanvas! Galleria > Structured Critiques
User Name
Password
Register Mark Forums Read

Salute to our Partners
WC! Sponsors

Our Sponsors
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #16   Report Bad Post  
Old 09-16-2012, 01:11 AM
harryfisherman harryfisherman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 74
 
Re: Mc Donald Cteek.. Final Structured Critique Please

Aires,

Thank you for commenting. I actually appreciate nit picking. The small dtails in any painting are what adds up to a good paining or not.

Thanks again.

Harry
Reply With Quote
  #17   Report Bad Post  
Old 09-16-2012, 01:53 AM
song_bird song_bird is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 565
 
Re: Mc Donald Cteek.. Final Structured Critique Please

I think tapering that straight vertical of the left tree grove works better:

Reply With Quote
  #18   Report Bad Post  
Old 09-17-2012, 07:20 PM
LynnDigby's Avatar
LynnDigby LynnDigby is offline
Lord of the Arts
Ohio
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,965
 
Hails from United States
Re: Mc Donald Cteek.. Final Structured Critique Please

Quote:
Originally Posted by harryfisherman
Aires,

Thank you for commenting. I actually appreciate nit picking. The small details in any painting are what adds up to a good painting or not.

Thanks again.

Harry

Hi, Harry. Ah, permission to nit pick!

Seriously, there is a lot that is right in this. You have seen and painted this scene in a pleasing manner.

The composition is working well, although i agree with the poster who mentioned the small central pine tree. its placement gives it too much importance, and removing it would be something to consider.

My first impressions of where to nit pick (LOL) were in regard to the color and edge work.

First, the color. On my monitor, which might not be reading exactly how the painting does, the cyans seemed a bit too saturated. I think I would move the sky down in intensity and perhaps shift it toward cobalt rather than cerulean. I see the stand of trees as the primary center of interest. As such, I think I might want to intensify both the contrast (value) and the brighter leaf colors to lead the eye more. I'd like to see the colors there pop more. Also, in the right bottom corner, darkening the water reflections might frame the center of interest more strongly.

Mind you, I'm a value freak.

Second, the edges...

Bravo for softening them!! So many painters neglect that and they end up with cut out looking, two dimensional shapes. You avoided this.

However, If you look comparatively at the edges, you have left the very focused ones in places where the eye doesn't necessarily need to linger, like the mountain edge against the sky. I'd lose that one.

Also, on the other hand, your foreground is very undefined. Typically, the closer something is to the eye, the more we can find some texture or hint of detail. While you don't want to go crazy and overload this area with tiny little flowers or individual grasses, you can hint at movements and textures with directional brushwork that doesn't take away from the center of interest, but rather leads us to it.

I don't know if you know of Richard Schmid's work, but there is one of his paintings (It's brilliant) that shows you what I'm saying. I'm not suggesting you blast away with a 3 inch brush, but where the focus is is where the eye rests. Edges and details exist mostly in the center of interest, yet even though it is further back, he energizes the foreground with indistinct but powerful directional brushwork that leads the eye right up to the tree.



I did a fast and sloppy Photoshop dealie with your painting to show you kind of what I mean. Forgive the awful "sharpen" tool. It made an ugly mess, but it kind of threw some texture in there, so I used it.


Hope these remarks helped!

Cheers!
Lynn
__________________
Lynn
L Y N N - D I G B Y

Last edited by LynnDigby : 09-17-2012 at 07:25 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:03 PM.


Copyright 1998-2013, F+W Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.