View Full Version : eyes ... or not
i liked it better without eyes
but nermal said 'giver her eyes fr g'ness sake'
i think i should quit listening to nermal
12-08-2019, 03:30 PM
I suppose it depends on what the piece is about.
I like the unreal feel on your paintings.
PS: I'll take some time to answer your question in Cafe Guerbois.
12-08-2019, 04:08 PM
Without eyes is better IMHO. Great mysterious figure!
12-08-2019, 08:41 PM
I never listen to normal people...
I, too, prefer the ambitiousness of the eyeless person
12-08-2019, 09:10 PM
Well, no eyes or different eyes
12-08-2019, 09:28 PM
I like her with eyes.
12-09-2019, 04:16 AM
claude j greengrass
12-09-2019, 11:37 AM
12-09-2019, 11:50 AM
Without for me. I do a lot of eyeless faces.
12-09-2019, 01:12 PM
I like the eyes. More hair might be good, too, if you are still working on it. It is a haunting portrait, I like it a lot. -Patrick
12-09-2019, 09:50 PM
eyes without iris or pupils, just a solid color.... : )
12-10-2019, 07:03 AM
I think it has more impact without the eyes
thanks guys/gals, appreciate your http://www.wetcanvas.com/Community/images/10-Dec-2019/84648-starescreen.gif, thoughts and votes
much as eyes tend to be the 'windows to the soul' ... this soul seems aware, or at least thoughtful/thought provoking, without 'em
12-17-2019, 03:46 PM
Late to the party, but I vote Without Eyes.
That version reinforces a Sphinx-like mystery to her. Knowing, but inscrutable.
12-22-2019, 09:48 AM
I thought the same :clap:
01-01-2020, 08:45 PM
Hi La -
I agree with Bilateral and also the interpretation that she, although immense and powerful, cannot see even what is in front of her and therefor vulnerable.
vBulletin® v3.5.8, Copyright ©2000-2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.