WetCanvas! Home
Home Member Services Content Areas Tools Info Center WC Partners Help
Channels:
Search for:
in:

[ Home: Critique Center: Giving Critique - a Check List for Critiquers ]
"Giving Critique - a Check List for Critiquers"
Page 2 of 2

Author: Henrik_Lindberg, Contributing Editor

How to give critique

Your critique should be divided into two sections: what has been done well and what could be improved. The focus should be on providing feedback that will help the artist - and onlookers - learn something.

What has been done well - select a few of the best things and say why you think they work.

What could be improved – select areas where the biggest improvements could be made and say why. Suggest ways the improvements could be made and give your reasons. Where appropriate, provide links to relevant examples or reference material. If the artist has chosen to allow digital alternations of their work you may like to provide an edited image to illustrate your points.

Don't

  • let the checklists dictate the form of the critique - you shouldn't try to comment on every item. Use them to help you pinpoint and analyse what has been done well and what could be improved.
  • overwhelm the artist by including too many suggestions or too much information.

Do

  • critique in a positive, non-judgmental spirit.
  • try to pitch your critique to the right level - you will not turn a beginner into an expert in a single step.
  • try to be as objective as possible and set aside your own taste in art - the critique is about the artist's work, not about you.

Remember, the artist is seeking constructive feedback on how to improve - both in the work under critique and for their future development. Therefore, your suggested improvements do not have to be corrections that can be easily made. For example, it may not be possible to completely rearrange a watercolor but the artist can incorporate what is learned in future work.

When the artwork is exceptionally good, and you can not find any improvements you can instead elaborate on the analysis and point out in more detail what has been done well - this could be more for the benefit of the onlookers than for the artist.

Finally, when giving a critique, try to think of yourself as being hired by the artist as a mentor or teacher, or perhaps a defense attorney whose job is to make your client's work look its best in court (even if it is hideous). If you truly dislike something and really can’t think of anything that would help, it is best to refrain from posting. If the artist has specifically asked for your opinion, perhaps, instead of a critique, you could suggest some exercises, articles, other artwork or reference material to look at. Remember there are plenty of lessons, projects, library images and other material here at WetCanvas! to refer to.

Start a Conversation!
Don't wait - discuss this topic with fellow artists now in our forum!
[ Previous Page

Quick Jump:

[ 1 - 2 ]

B i o g r a p h y
Henrik Lindberg is a WetCanvas! Contributing Author and has provided more than 300 detailed critiques and demos for the benefit of the WC! community.
-- No language can express every thought unambigously, least of all this one. --
E-Mail: henrik@artistnation.com Web Site: http://www.artistnation.com/members/paris/henrik

Copyright © 1998-2009, F+W Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved. FA