WetCanvas! Home
Home Member Services Content Areas Tools Info Center WC Partners Shop Help
Channels:
Search for:
in:

[ Home: Watercolors: Painting Large In Watercolor: Faded Glory ]
"Painting Large In Watercolor: Faded Glory"
Page 2 of 9

Author: Nicholas_Simmons, Contributing Editor

It can make an effective abstract underpainting, too.
On to the painting!

Many people enjoy painting flowers. I improvised all of my flowers for years; at least the first 250 paintings of my watercolor career were done without a speck of drawing. I was so excited about the properties of the medium, I didn't see any point in trying to tame it - the paint is a better artist than I was (and still is!). I think it's a tremendous way to exercise the imagination, since you have to look for things to develop, and adapt to the countless situations that arise. However, as I started to work larger, I found it increasingly risky to invent paintings on the spot, and started planning more things out.

I'll work from a photograph. Most people photograph flowers in full bloom, and shoot them from the same angles. I photographed a dying bouquet of roses, and concentrated on the undersides of the wilting flowers. This intrigues me more than the basic floral mug shot. Here is the photograph I selected, in black and white. I like the motion, angles, and aura of faded glory.
I projected the photo onto the paper, taped to the wall. I use a digital projector. As anybody who has traced large complex pictures from a projector or one of those mirror gizmos can tell you, it's no cakewalk . There are few, if any, definite lines, things look out of focus, and gradations of color and value make tracing a painstaking process of decisions and, ultimately, some degree of simplification, or complication, depending on your point of view. There is, I suppose, an art - an intuition, at least - to it. But it gets lonely - sometimes ugly - out there in the Artist Twilight Zone, eyes burning, neck craned, back aching, hand in a death-cramp. Weird stuff begins to loom in the mind: "If nobody sees this line, does it exist? Do I really want to draw that shadow half way over to the part that might come up to the far edge, if I decide to draw the reflection that meets it across the other side? Does that shape look too much like a pair of _____ ? (fill in the blank) Why am I doing this?" Ahhh, you wants the muse, you pays the dues.
The drawing is 34" x 45", and I tried to photograph it, but all you could see is paper. I made a type of drawing that is effective for large watercolors. The maze of passages, when filled with color, look abstract up close, but from a distance create a different effect that is startling.

Getting off on the wrong foot, I did the drawing before I coated the paper with gesso. Ouch. I gave it the gesso treatment anyway, and it didn't cover up the pencil lines much. Can't erase them now, that's for sure!
I brushed it on fairly randomly, changing the direction of the brush strokes often, and covered about 75% of the paper.
Start a Conversation!
Don't wait - discuss this topic with fellow artists now in our forum!
[ Previous Page ] [ Next Page ]

Quick Jump:

[ 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 ]

Copyright © 1998-2009, F+W Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved. FA